Cases March 10, 2022

McLinko v. Pennsylvania – Act 77- Vote-by-Mail (PA)

SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Issue Areas
Summary

In the Summer of 2021, Doug McLinko, a Bradford County election commissioner, and a group of Republican state lawmakers, filed lawsuits claiming Act 77—a vote-by-mail expansion law—is unconstitutional.  Eleven of the state lawmakers challenging the bipartisan law originally voted for it.   

Act 77 was passed in 2019 by the General Assembly with wide, bipartisan support. In addition to setting up a no-excuse mail-in voting system for any person in Pennsylvania, Act 77 gives Pennsylvania voters an additional two weeks to register to vote, allows them more time to return absentee ballots, and bars straight party ticket voting. Since its passage, more than five million Pennsylvania voters have used mail-in ballots, including in four primary and general elections in 2020 and 2021. Before the law was passed, only limited, with-excuse absentee voting had been available in the Commonwealth. 

On January 28, 2022, the Commonwealth Court struck down the mail-in voting law. Governor Tom Wolf’s administration along with the Department of State and the Acting Secretary of the Commonwealth appealed the decision to the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania. The States United Democracy Center is acting as pro bono counsel in this case along with Hangley Aronchick Segal Pudlin & Schiller and Kaplan Hecker & Fink LLP.  

On March 8, 2022, the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania held oral arguments. Act 77 remains in place while the justices deliberate.  

Latest Update

On August 2, 2022, in a 5-2 decision the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania overturned the Commonwealth Court’s decision, finding Act 77 constitutional.  

Related Documents