Grand Juries at Work
Charges for Trump in New York may only be the beginning.
As former President Trump himself pointed out this week, his indictment on 34 felony counts in New York may be only the beginning of legal consequences he’s facing.
A district attorney in Atlanta is examining whether Trump and his associates broke the law when they tried to reverse the results of Georgia’s presidential election in 2020. That investigation appears to be in its final stages.
In Washington, a Justice Department special counsel is overseeing probes into the events leading to the storming of the Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021, and into Trump’s handling of sensitive government documents.
The New York case turns on hush money payments to an adult film star, but the alleged motive is directly relevant to our democracy. District Attorney Alvin Bragg said Trump wanted to hide damaging information from voters in the final sprint of the 2016 campaign.
As these investigations increasingly dominate the news over the coming months, it’s worth remembering that each of them has been considered, or is being considered, by a grand jury made up of everyday Americans.
Their job is to look closely at all the facts to decide whether there’s enough for a criminal charge. Grand juries are not rubber stamps for prosecutors. They are critical checks on the prosecutors’ power.
In other words, these Trump investigations are examples of accountability by the people, for the people. When he makes political attacks against prosecutors and judges, he’s also attacking these citizens for doing their jobs by pursuing the truth.
As the judge in the New York case reminded Trump at his arraignment, it’s not a time to incite violence. It’s a time to be patient, respect the rule of law, and let the justice system do its work.
Sign up for the weekly newsletter here.
State of the States
In Wisconsin, Janet Protasiewicz, a Milwaukee County judge, was elected to the state Supreme Court, tilting the court’s majority to liberals for the first time in 15 years. Protasiewicz will serve a 10-year term and will help decide matters central to the state’s free and fair elections. Questions about redistricting, along with a range of voting issues, are expected to come before the court. This group of justices may also hear disputes related to Wisconsin’s presidential election next year, along with future state elections. Dan Kelly, who lost the race by more than 200,000 votes, according to the latest count, refused to concede.
In The News
- Former President Trump was arraigned in Manhattan on 34 felony counts of falsifying business records in an attempt to violate campaign finance laws. “We today uphold our solemn responsibility to ensure that everyone stands equal before the law,” District Attorney Alvin Bragg said as he unveiled the charges.
- In a race that drew nearly triple the spending of any previous state court election, Janet Protasiewicz, a Milwaukee County judge, was elected to the Wisconsin Supreme Court. The outcome flipped the ideological balance of the court, which frequently decides questions central to the state’s elections. Turnout in the race broke a record for spring elections in non-presidential primary years.
- Former Vice President Mike Pence will not appeal a court decision requiring him to appear before a grand jury investigating the events leading up to the Jan. 6 attack. A federal appeals court this week also rejected Trump’s effort to block his former aides from testifying to the same grand jury.
- Rupert Murdoch could be forced to testify in Dominion Voting Systems’ defamation lawsuit against Fox News. Fox plans to put some of its hosts on the witness stand as part of its defense. Documents released over the past few weeks highlight internal conversations among Fox staff showing that they knew the 2020 election was free, fair, and secure